Info Sessions

Food as Medicine

First 4 sessions:

Diabetes - Are we being told the truth?

We will discuss the real correct scientifically proven figures in the info sessions. The difference between the real ones and the ones that we have been told for decades is astounding!

Also, it depends on how you test, where you test,  and when you test what the figures should actually be.

Come join us and learn about your health!

The sugar industry began funding research that cast doubt on sugar's role in heart disease — in part by pointing the finger at fat — as early as the 1960s, according to an analysis of newly uncovered documents.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/sugar-harvard-conspiracy-1.3759582

 

If 95% of people who have been diagnosed with diabetes have been diagnosed with type 2, then why are the figures so high for insulin only and insulin and oral medication? While only 5% comprise all other types of diabetes diagnoses, should the figures not show that? Instead it indicates to me that 28.7% of people are taking insulin (14% + 14.7%). This means that anything over the 5% of people with diabetes that is NOT type 2 is being prescribed for type 2 diabetics (23.7%), who are already producing insulin themselves.

 

Instead of poisonous chemicals, we offer solutions from PhD´s, MD's, Chiropractors, Nutritionists, Fitness Instructors, Scientists, etc., whom are all heading in the same direction:

 

Food As Medicine.

Reiki helps to unblock, balance, and boost your immune system. It helps your organs work properly. Just remember, there are 4 stages of illness; spiritual, mental, emotional, and lastly physical.

 

Reiki and the other 30 or so ancient healing arts that I practice and teach to Master Teacher level, that have been around and working just fine for centuries are not really alternative. Allopathic medicine has only been around for 100 years or so and was started by a Rockefeller. Yes a Rockefeller! It used to be called Patent Medicine and around 1905-1906, was demonized and MD's were called quacks and people said they were poisoning people and that many people died from the poisons.

Interesting book:

Title:

The Great American Fraud

The Patent Medicine Evil

 

Author: Samuel Hopkins Adams

 

Release Date: December 1, 2013 [EBook #44325]

Last Updated: December 16, 2013

Language: English

 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1

Here free:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44325/44325-h/44325-h.htm

Reiki has been scientifically proven in many ways. It enhances the food as medicine, bringing out the wonderful qualities of the foods.

I feel the need to help people to realize just how much damage chemicals can do to your system.

My sister died directly from the 4 pages, yes 4-8 and a half by 11 inch pages of pills that the doctor had her on per day! She did not drink alcohol.

We started out with some similar illnesses. I will be 60 this year. I was on 22 pills a day 18 years ago. I am now on zero! I use Reiki and other energy medicines, exercise, and Food As Medicine to keep fit and keep healthy. I lead by example.

I have clients who have used my strategies and the energy and have been off medications for years now! Check out the testimonials on the main page of my site to see some amazing stories!

XXXXXXXX

Back in the 1950's 60's and 70's certain cut-points were established for readings such as blood glucose, blood pressure, cholesterol, etc.

Cut points are the levels at which a person's blood glucose/blood pressure/ cholesterol etc should be below.

These levels were scientifically proven.

 

Since then they have been lowered, and lowered, and lowered, and in some cases lowered again with no apparent scientific proof of the reasoning behind it.

In my humble opinion doctors, sometimes unwittingly, are coaching people to try and achieve unattainable goals.

How do you feel when, for instance, your blood glucose levels are close to 6?

In my experience, when I get down that low I feel woozy, dizzy, unable to drive.

My Dad almost went into a diabetic coma when I was a teenager. I led him into a restaurant and got him some orange juice and a sandwich. What if he had been alone??

I had to bring my Mom out of a diabetic coma that she was actually in (not a close call like my Dad), also when I was a teenager. Again what if she had been alone??

In doing this research I have just realized why they even got to that state in the first place.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease.

 

Your body attacks the pancreas and it slows right down in insulin production to sometimes nil.

Type 2 diabetes is where your pancreas does create sometimes substantial amounts of insulin, but your body (through the liver) is not utilizing it properly.

We discuss other types as well but these types are pertinent as to why I believe people need to know this information the most.

Both my parents were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Neither of

them should have been prescribed insulin in my humble opinion.

My Dad was on one type of insulin and my Mom was on two types!

The high insulin levels drove their blood glucose down so low that they were in hypoglycemia!

As you will find out in the Info Sessions, according to MD's PhD's, a Nephrologist, a Fitness Instructor, a Nutritionist, a Chiropractor, etc., low blood glucose levels are worse than high ones.

You see high levels work over a sometimes long period of time (weeks, months, years), whereas low levels can affect you in minutes to hours. 

By the way it led to high blood pressure for my Dad and 6 heart attacks and angioplasty for my Mom before they died.

Strangely enough my Mom died of cancer that started in the liver and pancreas. Do you think that the high insulin levels might have caused all that?

According to doctors with proof yes. 

My sister also had diabetes type 2. Her doctor had her eventually on medications for diabetes, then more and more other illnesses that stemmed from the original medications and eventually she was on 4 pages of medication a day...until she died of cirrhosis of the liver after they took the cancer out of her liver. She had been diagnosed with both.

I was blanket diagnosed by a Gynacologist

(OB-GYN) 15 years ago. 

He said you have polycystic ovaries and with that "sometimes" comes diabetes and hypothyroidism, so here's a prescription for 4 Metformin a day and Synthroid.

No blood test no nothing.

 

Looking back I had no dizziness, no blurriness, no tingly legs or feet, no kidney problems, no extreme thirst, no symptoms of diabetes at all before I started taking the Metformin.

As I find out now, I not only don't have diabetes, I never did!

After I quit Metformin (and I am not saying quit Metformin) I can now go to 3 stores with drives in between before having to go to the bathroom, where as while on it I sometimes had to go to the loo 3 times in 1 store!

Find out for yourself!

We have lots of information. 

Videos, handouts, refreshments. $20 per person per session.

Below is what a doctor prescribed for me as a 6 month old child. Note the ginger ale, Coca Cola, and orange juice, as well as 6 tablespoons of sugar in boiled water.

By the way I was diagnosed with chronic upper respiratory infection months before the doctor's visit below, and caught every cold and flu going around, usually with pneumonia or bronchitis along with it.

 

I haven't had a cold or flu in 23 years (when I had a Reiki treatment from someone else, 5 years before I learned Reiki myself).

 

 

When I was a teenager a man walked in to a truck stop that I worked at. He was slurring his words and acting as if he was drunk. Some wanted to call the police. 911 was called instead, as he was hypoglycemic.

 

Iatrogenic:
Relating to illness caused by medical examination or treatment.

Hypoglycemia:

Caused by high insulin levels creating low blood glucose (which can cause coma and/or death).

Idiopathic:

Relating to or denoting any disease or condition that arises spontaneously or for which the cause is unknown.

Autonomic Failure:

Malfunction of the autonomic nervous system due to imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of that sector of the nervous system.

 

Disclaimer:

We are NOT doctors. We provide scientifically based information FROM doctors etc.

We are not saying go off your medication, whether it be insulin, glucophage (a long acting type of metformin), januvia, metformin, or other types of medication.

 

We are saying that along with the knowledge and support of a health professional you have other options.

You can take back the control of your own health.

"This week, researchers in France who followed the drinking habits of 66,000 women for 14 years reported that both regular and diet pop increase the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, but the risk was higher among diet drinkers — 15 per cent higher for consumption of as little as 500 ml per week and 59 per cent higher for those having 1.5 litres per week."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/artificial-sweeteners-tied-to-obesity-type-2-diabetes-1.1352987

Remember:

Low fat = High Sugar and chemicals.

Why? Because they have to add something to replace the taste of the fat, otherwise it would taste bland.

Now for the truth! It's not saturated fat that you should avoid; it's added sugar! Find out why in our info sessions.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

"The revelations are important because the debate about the relative harms of sugar and saturated fat continues today, Dr. Glantz said. For many decades, health officials encouraged Americans to reduce their fat intake, which led many people to consume low-fat, high-sugar foods that some experts now blame for fueling the obesity crisis."

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-shifted-blame-to-fat.html

 

Again, we are not recommending that anyone stop their medication cold turkey. We are presenting researched information from well known doctors,  PhD's, MD's, Chiropractors, Nutritionists, Fitness Instructors, etc. Take what you resonate with. Leave the rest.

Add in Energy Medicine and it's the perfect match!

Heart Health

So 4 times the amount of people died of heart failure with systolic rates of under 120 (the first number of your blood pressure) than systolic rates of over 161!

The figures that I have researched come from sources like the Journal of the American Medical Association, and other scientific journals and peer reviewed articles and journals.

So, according to the National Heart Lungs, Blood Institute, Angiograms are only accurate 22% of the time. That means that they are inaccurate (WRONG) 78% of the time!

How can a test that is wrong 78% of the time be the gold standard? How can it be morally used at all?

Notice the energy drinks. They are bad for heart health yet a huge amount of people in Canada and the USA drink them.

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

Table salt is where they have taken out all the wonderful over 80 different minerals from Himalayan or sea salt, bleached it, thrown in some iodine and some chemicals to stop it from clumping together and said "Here's your salt." This salt is bad for the heart. The only thing that is not bad in it is the iodine, which you can get from roasted seaweed, kelp, potassium iodine and iodine drops, etc.

Himalayan and some other sea salts still have the over 80 minerals in them, including potassium, which although a form of salt, offsets the sodium levels in salt and helps your body to use the salt properly. This salt is not bad for the heart.

As a matter of fact potassium is needed in your body. If a doctor prescribes diuretics in pharmaceutical pill form, most of them deplete the potassium levels in your body. Be careful with these. The best diuretic that I have found so far is Dandelion. It doesn't deplete your potassium levels.

The best blood thinner? Water!!!

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

The following list is an example of NSAIDs available:

aspirin
celecoxib (Celebrex)
diclofenac (Cambia, Cataflam, Voltaren-XR, Zipsor, Zorvolex)
diflunisal (Dolobid - discontinued brand)
etodolac (Lodine - discontinued brand)
ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil)
indomethacin (Indocin)
ketoprofen (Active-Ketoprofen [Orudis - discontinued brand])
ketorolac (Toradol - discontinued brand)
nabumetone (Relafen - discontinued brand)
naproxen (Aleve, Anaprox, Naprelan, Naprosyn)
oxaprozin (Daypro)
piroxicam (Feldene)
salsalate (Disalsate [Amigesic - discontinued brand])
sulindac (Clinoril - discontinued brand)
tolmetin (Tolectin - discontinued brand)

Side Effects of NSAIDS

See more about what they can do to you and alternatives to these dangerous drugs at the Info Sessions on Heart Health under Food as Medicine!

Vaccines

US government loses landmark lawsuit, not for vaccine injury but because they lied for over 30 years, saying vaccines were safe and effective when they are NOT!

 

Zero evidence that vaccines should have ever been put on the market. Not one document that they could produce to show that the government office that is supposed to make sure that our babies are kept safe had actually done their job. Not one sheet of paper showing that the taxpayers money that pays them has paid for a real service that they had performed. Over 30 years worth of giving vaccines to our babies that were unsafe and causing horrible, debilitating diseases, and even death!

Allergies that the vaccine industry refused to attribute to vaccines include but are not limited to peanut allergies. 

Here is an article from the New York Times from 1964 about adjuvant 65 (containing peanut oil):

"WASHINGTON, Sept. 18—A pharmaceutical manufacturer has developed a vaccine that it predicts will considerably lengthen immunity from influenza and other virus infections, thereby requiring fewer “shots.”

The key ingredient, called Adjuvant 65, which contains peanut oil, was patented this week for Merck & Co., Inc., by Dr. Allen F. Woodhour and Dr. Thomas B. Stim. They, discovered it in the company's research laboratory at West Point, Pa.

Present procedure, according to Merck, is to give annual injections of killed influenza virus, which are expected to afford protection for a year. The hope is that the new vaccine will extend the immunity to at least two years and be more effective during that period."

https://www.nytimes.com/1964/09/19/archives/peanut-oil-used-in-a-new-vaccine-product-patented-for-merck-said-to.html

 

Please be advised that if you look at the slides and articles you will see my sources. They are all from valid medical sources, peer reviewed journals, medical associations, foundations, news articles on the same, etc.

 

Check out the slide above to see the horrific diseases that establish within 28 days of a vaccination.

 

These are a drop in the bucket as to how much actual peer reviewed articles, articles and videos from Doctors such as MDs, PhDs, Nephrologists, Scientists, Virologists, etc I have. I have proof of everything I say.

 

Also, the peanut oil controversy has been going on for over a half a century. All I can say is that if a company or companies do not have to, by law, put all the ingredients on a list, most times they will not. Adjuvant 65 partly consists of peanut oil , just as Thimerosal partly (50%) consists of mercury. Some countries use ingredients that other countries do not.

Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic

– Dr Tim O’Shea

Have you ever wondered why so many kids these days are allergic to peanuts? Where did this allergy come from all of a sudden?

Before 1900, reactions to peanuts were unheard of. Today almost a 1.5 million children in this country are allergic to peanuts.

What happened? Why is everybody buying EpiPens now?

Looking at all the problems with vaccines during the past decade, [2] just a superficial awareness is enough to raise the suspicion that vaccines might have some role in the appearance of any novel allergy among children.

But reactions to peanuts are not just another allergy. Peanut allergy has suddenly emerged as the #1 cause of death from food reactions, being in a category of allergens able to cause anaphylaxis. This condition brings the risk of asthma attack, shock, respiratory failure, and even death. Primarily among children.

Sources cited in Heather Fraser’s 2011 book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic suggest a vaccine connection much more specifically. We learn that a class of vaccine adjuvants – excipients – is a likely suspect in what may accurately be termed an epidemic. [1]

But let’s back up a little. We have to look at both vaccines and antibiotics in recent history, and the physical changes the ingredients in these brand new medicines introduced into the blood of children.

ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK AND ALLERGY

Before 1900, anaphylactic shock was virtually unknown. The syndrome of sudden fainting, respiratory distress, convulsions, and sometimes death did not exist until vaccinators switched from the lancet to the hypodermic needle. That transformation was essentially complete by the turn of the century in the western world.

Right at that time, a new disease called Serum Sickness began to afflict thousands of children. A variety of symptoms, including shock, fainting, and sometimes death, could suddenly result following an injection.

Instead of covering it up, the connection was well recognized and documented in the medical literature of the day. Dr Clemens Von Pirquet, who actually coined the word “allergy,” was a leading researcher in characterizing the new disease. [5] Serum Sickness was the first mass allergenic phenomenon in history. What had been required for its onset, apparently, was the advent of the hypodermic needle.

When the needle replaced the lancet in the late 1800s, Serum Sickness soon became a frequent visitor to the child’s bed. It was a known consequence of vaccinations. Indeed, the entire field of modern allergy has evolved from the early study of Serum Sickness coming from vaccines.

VACCINE HYPERSENSITIVITY

Von Pirquet recognized that vaccines had 2 primary effects:  immunity and hypersensitivity. [5] He said they were inseparable: the one was the price of the other.

In other words, if we were going to benefit from the effects of mass immunization, we must accept the downside of mass hypersensitivity as a necessary co-feature. Modern medicine has decided that this double effect should be kept secret, so they don’t allow it to be brought up much.

Many doctors in the early 1900s were dead set against vaccines for this precise reason. The advertised benefit was not proven to be worth the risk. Doctors like Walter Hadwen MD, Wm. Howard Hay, and Alfred Russell Wallace saw how smallpox vaccines had actually increased the incidence of smallpox. [2,3] Wallace was one of the principal epidemiologists of the age, and his charts showing the increase in smallpox death from vaccination are unassailable – meticulous primary sources.

Another landmark researcher of the early 1900s was Dr Charles Richet, the one who coined the term anaphylaxis. [4] Richet focused on the reactions that some people seemed to have to certain foods. He found that with food allergies, the reaction came on as the result of intact proteins in the food having bypassed the digestive system and making their way intact into the blood, via leaky gut.

Foreign protein in the blood, of course, is a universal trigger for allergic reaction, not just in man but in all animals. [6]

But Richet noted that in the severe cases, food anaphylaxis did not happen just by eating a food. That would simply be food poisoning.

Food anaphylaxis is altogether different. This sudden, violent reaction requires an initial sensitization involving injection of some sort, followed by a later ingestion of the sensitized food. Get the shot, then later eat the food.

The initial exposure creates the hypersensitivity. The second exposure would be the violent, perhaps fatal, physical event.

Richet’s early work around 1900 was primarily with eggs, meat, milk and diphtheria proteins. Not peanuts. The value of Richet’s research with reactive foods was to teach us the sequence of allergic sensitivity leading to anaphylaxis, how that had to take place.

Soon other doctors began to notice striking similarities between food reactions and the serum sickness that was associated with vaccines. Same exact clinical presentation.

PENICILLIN

Next up was penicillin, which became popular in the 1940s. It was soon found that additives called excipients were necessary to prolong the effect of the antibiotic injected into the body. The excipients would act as carrier molecules.Without excipients, the penicillin would only last about 2 hours. Refined oils worked best, acting as time-release capsules for the antibiotic.

Peanut oil became the favorite, because it worked well, and was available and inexpensive.

Allergy to penicillin became common, and was immediately recognized as a sensitivity to the excipient oils. To the present day, that’s why they always ask if you’re allergic to penicillin. The allergy is a sensitivity to the excipients.

By 1953 as many as 12% of the population was allergic to penicillin. [1] But considering the upside with life-threatening bacterial infections, it was still a good deal – a worthwhile risk.

By 1950 antibiotics were being given out like M&Ms. Soldiers, children, anybody with any illness, not just bacterial. Despite Alexander Fleming’s severe warnings against prophylactic antibiotics, antibiotics were given indiscriminately as the new wonder drug. Just in case anything. [7] Only then, in the 1950s, did peanut allergy begin to occur, even though Americans had been eating peanuts for well over a century.

Remember – just eating peanuts cannot cause peanut allergy. Except if they are allowed to become moldy of course, in which case aflatoxins are released. But that’s really not a peanut allergy.

When peanut allergy did appear, the numbers of cases were fairly small and initially it wasn’t even considered worthy of study.

THE RISE OF VACCINES

The big change came with vaccines. Peanut oils were introduced as vaccine excipients in the mid 1960s. An article appeared in the NY Times on 18 Sept, 1964 that would never be printed today. [8] The author described how a newly patented ingredient containing peanut oil was added as an adjuvant to a new flu vaccine, in order to prolong the “immunity.” The oil was reported to act as a time release capsule, and theoretically enhanced the vaccine’s strength. Same mechanism as with penicillin.

That new excipient, though not approved in the US, became the model for subsequent vaccines. ([1] p 103)

By 1980 peanut oil had become the preferred excipient in vaccines, even though the dangers were well documented. [9] It was considered an adjuvant – a substance able to increase reactivity to the vaccine. This reinforced the Adjuvant Myth: the illusion that immune response is the same as immunity [2].

The pretense here is that the stronger the allergic response to the vaccine, the greater will be the immunity that is conferred. This fundamental error is consistent throughout vaccine literature of the past century.

Historically, researchers who challenged this Commandment of vaccine mythology did not advance their careers.

KEEPING PEANUT ADJUVANTS A SECRET

The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines.

What is listed in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula. Same with the inserts. Suddenly after 1973, that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers knew it must be protected. Intellectual property. So now they only were required to describe the formula in general.

Why was peanut allergy so violent? Adjuvant pioneer Maurice Hilleman claimed peanut oil adjuvants had all protein removed by refining. [9] The FDA disagreed. They said some peanut protein traces would always persist [10]- that even the most refined peanut oils still contained some traces of intact peanut proteins. This was the reason doctors were directed to inject vaccines intramuscular rather than intravenous – a greater chance of absorption of intact proteins, less chance of reaction.

But all their secret research obviously wasn’t enough to prevent sensitivity. Mother Nature bats last: no intact proteins in the body. 60 million years of Natural Selection didn’t create the mammalian immune system for nothing. Put intact proteins, peanut or whatever, for any imagined reason into the human system and the inflammatory response will fire. And since the goal of oil emulsion adjuvants was to prolong reactivity in the first place – the notion of time-release – this led to sensitization.

PEANUT ALLERGY EPIDEMIC

Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared. What changed? The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s:

1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines

It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed. But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body. In 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months.

A new kind of anaphylaxis appeared with peanut reactions: reverse anaphylaxis. (p 172, [1]) The reaction was not only to the sensitizing antigen, but to the weird new antibodies that had just been introduced in the human species by the new antigen. Without the usual benefit of the evolutionary process.

As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of kids were now exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with frequent cases of anaphylaxis reactions, sometimes fatal.

But nobody talked about it.

Following the next enormous increase in vaccines on the Mandated Schedule after 9/11, whereby the total shot up to 68 recommended vaccines, the peanut allergy soon reached epidemic proportions: a million children: 1.5% of them. These numbers fit the true definition of epidemic even though that word has never been used in mainstream literature with respect to peanut allergy, except in Fraser’s odd little book.

Many researchers, not just Heather Fraser, could see very clearly that

“The peanut allergy epidemic in children was precipitated by childhood injections.”
( [1], p 106)

But with the newfound research, the medical profession will do what they always must do – bury it. Protect the companies. So no money will be ever allocated from NIH to study the obvious connection between vaccine excipients and peanut allergy. That cannot happen, primarily because it would require a control group – an unvaccinated population. And that is the Unspoken Forbidden.

Same line of reasoning that has prevented Wakefield’s work from ever being replicated in a mainstream US clinical study. No unvaccinated populations. Which actually means no studies whose outcome could possibly implicate vaccines as a source of disease or immunosuppression. Vaccines as a cause of an allergy epidemic? Impossible. Let’s definitely not study it.

Instead let’s spend the next 20 years looking for the Genetic Link to the childhood peanut allergy epidemic…

In such a flawed system, any pretense of true clinical science is revealed as fatally handicapped of course: we are looking for the truth, wherever our studies shall take us, except for this, and this, and oh yes, this.

Evidence for the connection between peanut excipients and vaccines is largely indirect today, because of the circling of the wagons by the manufacturers. It is very difficult to find peanut excipients listed in the inserts and PDR listings of vaccines. Simple liability.

FRAME OF REFERENCE

So in addition to all the other problems with vaccines delineated in our text, now we have a new one – peanut oil excipients. Which all by themselves can cause severe, even fatal, episodes of shock, as well as chronic allergy – irrespective of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, and the attenuated pathogens which the manufacturers do admit to.

Quite a toxic burden to saddle the unprotected newborn with. No wonder the US Supreme Court refers to vaccines as “unavoidably unsafe.”

Childhood allergies doubled between 1980 and 2000, and have doubled again since that time. [11] Theories abound. Childhood vaccines doubled at the same time. Why is there a virtual blackout of viable discussion about this glaring fact?

The epidemic of peanut allergy is just one facet of this much broader social phenomenon. We have the sickest, most allergic kids of any country, industrialized or not, on Earth. A study of the standard literature of vaccines is identical to a study of the history of adjuvants – an exercise in cover-up and dissimulation. Unvaccinated children don’t become autistic. And they don’t go into shock from eating peanuts.

But there can never be a formal clinical study where the control group is unvaccinated. NIH would never do that. They cannot. They know the outcome.

references

1. Fraser, H, The Peanut allergy epidemic, Skyhorse 2011

2. O’Shea, T, Vaccination is not immunization, thedoctorwithin 2013

3. Wallace, AR, Vaccine delusion, 1898

4. Richet, C, Nobel lecture, acceptance speech, 11 Dec 1913
Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967
www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1913/richet-lecture.html

5. Von Pirquet, C, MD, On the theory of infectious disease
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 80, January 1987

6. O’Shea, T, Allergies: the threshold of reactivity
www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies-the-threshold-of-reactivity/

7. O’Shea, T, The post antibiotic age
www.thedoctorwithin.com/post-antibiotic-age/

8. Jones, S, Peanut oil used in a new vaccine New York Times 18 Sep 13

9. HOBSON, D, MD, The potential role of immunological adjuvants
in influenza vaccines Postgraduate Medical Journal March 1973 , no. 49, p 180.
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/49/569/180.full.pdf

9. Technical Report # 595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_595.pdf

10. FDA: March 2006. Approaches to Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens
www.fda.gov/downloads/food/labelingnutrition/foodallergenslabeling/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/ucm192048.pdf

11. O’Shea, T, The threshold of reactivity
www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies-the-threshold-of-reactivity/

https://thedoctorwithin.com/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic

Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic

– Dr Tim O’Shea

Have you ever wondered why so many kids these days are allergic to peanuts? Where did this allergy come from all of a sudden?

Before 1900, reactions to peanuts were unheard of. Today almost a 1.5 million children in this country are allergic to peanuts.

What happened? Why is everybody buying EpiPens now?

Looking at all the problems with vaccines during the past decade, [2] just a superficial awareness is enough to raise the suspicion that vaccines might have some role in the appearance of any novel allergy among children.

But reactions to peanuts are not just another allergy. Peanut allergy has suddenly emerged as the #1 cause of death from food reactions, being in a category of allergens able to cause anaphylaxis. This condition brings the risk of asthma attack, shock, respiratory failure, and even death. Primarily among children.

Sources cited in Heather Fraser’s 2011 book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic suggest a vaccine connection much more specifically. We learn that a class of vaccine adjuvants – excipients – is a likely suspect in what may accurately be termed an epidemic. [1]

But let’s back up a little. We have to look at both vaccines and antibiotics in recent history, and the physical changes the ingredients in these brand new medicines introduced into the blood of children.

ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK AND ALLERGY

Before 1900, anaphylactic shock was virtually unknown. The syndrome of sudden fainting, respiratory distress, convulsions, and sometimes death did not exist until vaccinators switched from the lancet to the hypodermic needle. That transformation was essentially complete by the turn of the century in the western world.

Right at that time, a new disease called Serum Sickness began to afflict thousands of children. A variety of symptoms, including shock, fainting, and sometimes death, could suddenly result following an injection.

Instead of covering it up, the connection was well recognized and documented in the medical literature of the day. Dr Clemens Von Pirquet, who actually coined the word “allergy,” was a leading researcher in characterizing the new disease. [5] Serum Sickness was the first mass allergenic phenomenon in history. What had been required for its onset, apparently, was the advent of the hypodermic needle.

When the needle replaced the lancet in the late 1800s, Serum Sickness soon became a frequent visitor to the child’s bed. It was a known consequence of vaccinations. Indeed, the entire field of modern allergy has evolved from the early study of Serum Sickness coming from vaccines.

VACCINE HYPERSENSITIVITY

Von Pirquet recognized that vaccines had 2 primary effects:  immunity and hypersensitivity. [5] He said they were inseparable: the one was the price of the other.

In other words, if we were going to benefit from the effects of mass immunization, we must accept the downside of mass hypersensitivity as a necessary co-feature. Modern medicine has decided that this double effect should be kept secret, so they don’t allow it to be brought up much.

Many doctors in the early 1900s were dead set against vaccines for this precise reason. The advertised benefit was not proven to be worth the risk. Doctors like Walter Hadwen MD, Wm. Howard Hay, and Alfred Russell Wallace saw how smallpox vaccines had actually increased the incidence of smallpox. [2,3] Wallace was one of the principal epidemiologists of the age, and his charts showing the increase in smallpox death from vaccination are unassailable – meticulous primary sources.

Another landmark researcher of the early 1900s was Dr Charles Richet, the one who coined the term anaphylaxis. [4] Richet focused on the reactions that some people seemed to have to certain foods. He found that with food allergies, the reaction came on as the result of intact proteins in the food having bypassed the digestive system and making their way intact into the blood, via leaky gut.

Foreign protein in the blood, of course, is a universal trigger for allergic reaction, not just in man but in all animals. [6]

But Richet noted that in the severe cases, food anaphylaxis did not happen just by eating a food. That would simply be food poisoning.

Food anaphylaxis is altogether different. This sudden, violent reaction requires an initial sensitization involving injection of some sort, followed by a later ingestion of the sensitized food. Get the shot, then later eat the food.

The initial exposure creates the hypersensitivity. The second exposure would be the violent, perhaps fatal, physical event.

Richet’s early work around 1900 was primarily with eggs, meat, milk and diphtheria proteins. Not peanuts. The value of Richet’s research with reactive foods was to teach us the sequence of allergic sensitivity leading to anaphylaxis, how that had to take place.

Soon other doctors began to notice striking similarities between food reactions and the serum sickness that was associated with vaccines. Same exact clinical presentation.

PENICILLIN

Next up was penicillin, which became popular in the 1940s. It was soon found that additives called excipients were necessary to prolong the effect of the antibiotic injected into the body. The excipients would act as carrier molecules.Without excipients, the penicillin would only last about 2 hours. Refined oils worked best, acting as time-release capsules for the antibiotic.

Peanut oil became the favorite, because it worked well, and was available and inexpensive.

Allergy to penicillin became common, and was immediately recognized as a sensitivity to the excipient oils. To the present day, that’s why they always ask if you’re allergic to penicillin. The allergy is a sensitivity to the excipients.

By 1953 as many as 12% of the population was allergic to penicillin. [1] But considering the upside with life-threatening bacterial infections, it was still a good deal – a worthwhile risk.

By 1950 antibiotics were being given out like M&Ms. Soldiers, children, anybody with any illness, not just bacterial. Despite Alexander Fleming’s severe warnings against prophylactic antibiotics, antibiotics were given indiscriminately as the new wonder drug. Just in case anything. [7] Only then, in the 1950s, did peanut allergy begin to occur, even though Americans had been eating peanuts for well over a century.

Remember – just eating peanuts cannot cause peanut allergy. Except if they are allowed to become moldy of course, in which case aflatoxins are released. But that’s really not a peanut allergy.

When peanut allergy did appear, the numbers of cases were fairly small and initially it wasn’t even considered worthy of study.

THE RISE OF VACCINES

The big change came with vaccines. Peanut oils were introduced as vaccine excipients in the mid 1960s. An article appeared in the NY Times on 18 Sept, 1964 that would never be printed today. [8] The author described how a newly patented ingredient containing peanut oil was added as an adjuvant to a new flu vaccine, in order to prolong the “immunity.” The oil was reported to act as a time release capsule, and theoretically enhanced the vaccine’s strength. Same mechanism as with penicillin.

That new excipient, though not approved in the US, became the model for subsequent vaccines. ([1] p 103)

By 1980 peanut oil had become the preferred excipient in vaccines, even though the dangers were well documented. [9] It was considered an adjuvant – a substance able to increase reactivity to the vaccine. This reinforced the Adjuvant Myth: the illusion that immune response is the same as immunity [2].

The pretense here is that the stronger the allergic response to the vaccine, the greater will be the immunity that is conferred. This fundamental error is consistent throughout vaccine literature of the past century.

Historically, researchers who challenged this Commandment of vaccine mythology did not advance their careers.

KEEPING PEANUT ADJUVANTS A SECRET

The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines.

What is listed in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula. Same with the inserts. Suddenly after 1973, that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers knew it must be protected. Intellectual property. So now they only were required to describe the formula in general.

Why was peanut allergy so violent? Adjuvant pioneer Maurice Hilleman claimed peanut oil adjuvants had all protein removed by refining. [9] The FDA disagreed. They said some peanut protein traces would always persist [10]- that even the most refined peanut oils still contained some traces of intact peanut proteins. This was the reason doctors were directed to inject vaccines intramuscular rather than intravenous – a greater chance of absorption of intact proteins, less chance of reaction.

But all their secret research obviously wasn’t enough to prevent sensitivity. Mother Nature bats last: no intact proteins in the body. 60 million years of Natural Selection didn’t create the mammalian immune system for nothing. Put intact proteins, peanut or whatever, for any imagined reason into the human system and the inflammatory response will fire. And since the goal of oil emulsion adjuvants was to prolong reactivity in the first place – the notion of time-release – this led to sensitization.

PEANUT ALLERGY EPIDEMIC

Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared. What changed? The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s:

1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines

It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed. But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body. In 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months.

A new kind of anaphylaxis appeared with peanut reactions: reverse anaphylaxis. (p 172, [1]) The reaction was not only to the sensitizing antigen, but to the weird new antibodies that had just been introduced in the human species by the new antigen. Without the usual benefit of the evolutionary process.

As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of kids were now exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with frequent cases of anaphylaxis reactions, sometimes fatal.

But nobody talked about it.

Following the next enormous increase in vaccines on the Mandated Schedule after 9/11, whereby the total shot up to 68 recommended vaccines, the peanut allergy soon reached epidemic proportions: a million children: 1.5% of them. These numbers fit the true definition of epidemic even though that word has never been used in mainstream literature with respect to peanut allergy, except in Fraser’s odd little book.

Many researchers, not just Heather Fraser, could see very clearly that

“The peanut allergy epidemic in children was precipitated by childhood injections.”
( [1], p 106)

But with the newfound research, the medical profession will do what they always must do – bury it. Protect the companies. So no money will be ever allocated from NIH to study the obvious connection between vaccine excipients and peanut allergy. That cannot happen, primarily because it would require a control group – an unvaccinated population. And that is the Unspoken Forbidden.

Same line of reasoning that has prevented Wakefield’s work from ever being replicated in a mainstream US clinical study. No unvaccinated populations. Which actually means no studies whose outcome could possibly implicate vaccines as a source of disease or immunosuppression. Vaccines as a cause of an allergy epidemic? Impossible. Let’s definitely not study it.

Instead let’s spend the next 20 years looking for the Genetic Link to the childhood peanut allergy epidemic…

In such a flawed system, any pretense of true clinical science is revealed as fatally handicapped of course: we are looking for the truth, wherever our studies shall take us, except for this, and this, and oh yes, this.

Evidence for the connection between peanut excipients and vaccines is largely indirect today, because of the circling of the wagons by the manufacturers. It is very difficult to find peanut excipients listed in the inserts and PDR listings of vaccines. Simple liability.

FRAME OF REFERENCE

So in addition to all the other problems with vaccines delineated in our text, now we have a new one – peanut oil excipients. Which all by themselves can cause severe, even fatal, episodes of shock, as well as chronic allergy – irrespective of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, and the attenuated pathogens which the manufacturers do admit to.

Quite a toxic burden to saddle the unprotected newborn with. No wonder the US Supreme Court refers to vaccines as “unavoidably unsafe.”

Childhood allergies doubled between 1980 and 2000, and have doubled again since that time. [11] Theories abound. Childhood vaccines doubled at the same time. Why is there a virtual blackout of viable discussion about this glaring fact?

The epidemic of peanut allergy is just one facet of this much broader social phenomenon. We have the sickest, most allergic kids of any country, industrialized or not, on Earth. A study of the standard literature of vaccines is identical to a study of the history of adjuvants – an exercise in cover-up and dissimulation. Unvaccinated children don’t become autistic. And they don’t go into shock from eating peanuts.

But there can never be a formal clinical study where the control group is unvaccinated. NIH would never do that. They cannot. They know the outcome.

references

1. Fraser, H, The Peanut allergy epidemic, Skyhorse 2011

2. O’Shea, T, Vaccination is not immunization, thedoctorwithin 2013

3. Wallace, AR, Vaccine delusion, 1898

4. Richet, C, Nobel lecture, acceptance speech, 11 Dec 1913
Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967
www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1913/richet-lecture.html

5. Von Pirquet, C, MD, On the theory of infectious disease
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 80, January 1987

6. O’Shea, T, Allergies: the threshold of reactivity
www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies-the-threshold-of-reactivity/

7. O’Shea, T, The post antibiotic age
www.thedoctorwithin.com/post-antibiotic-age/

8. Jones, S, Peanut oil used in a new vaccine New York Times 18 Sep 13

9. HOBSON, D, MD, The potential role of immunological adjuvants
in influenza vaccines Postgraduate Medical Journal March 1973 , no. 49, p 180.
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/49/569/180.full.pdf

9. Technical Report # 595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_595.pdf

10. FDA: March 2006. Approaches to Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens
www.fda.gov/downloads/food/labelingnutrition/foodallergenslabeling/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/ucm192048.pdf

11. O’Shea, T, The threshold of reactivity
www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies-the-threshold-of-reactivity/

https://thedoctorwithin.com/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

This is a graph showing the mortality rates due to (Wild) Polio beginning close to 1920 and extending past when the Polio vaccines were invented. Clearly, it shows that the cases of Polio were almost totally eradicated and were still on the way down long before vaccines were invented. I believe that better hygiene practices and better sanitation had a lot to do with the decline, and the continued decline, of Polio cases.

© 2014 Aura Healing Products. Proudly created with Wix.com

RSS Feed
  • w-facebook
  • w-googleplus
  • Twitter Clean